Affiliate disclosure. When you sign up via our links we may earn a commission. Rankings stay independent. Read full disclosure →
Up to 25% APR
EN
Loanch logo

Loanch review.

Use with caution Budapest, Hungary Short-term consumer (Southeast Asia)
By Daniel Brenner, Senior Editor · Updated 2026-05-01
CrowdIndex score
2.5 / 10
★☆☆☆☆
Avoid Until Resolved
Avg. Return
13–14.5%
Min. Investment
€10
Auto-invest
—
Regulator
Unregulated
Since
2022
Founded2022
HQBudapest, Hungary
RegulatorUnregulated
AUM~€51M+
Investors~14.2K+
Avg yield13–14.5%
Min€10
Bonus—
Languages8
Secondary mktNo
AutoInvest—
Default rateNot disclosed

Loanch Review — High-Yield P2P Tied to a Single Asian Lending Group with Significant Ownership Red Flags

★☆☆☆☆ Avoid Until Resolved | CrowdIndex Score: 3.2 / 10

Hungarian-registered peer-to-peer platform — operationally migrated to Croatia in March 2026 — that funds short-term consumer loans in Southeast Asia through originators owned by the same parent group as the platform itself. Advertised yields sit at 13% to 14.5%, but the structural conflict of interest, the absence of any external regulator, and the documented background of the beneficial owners place Loanch in the bottom tier of the CrowdIndex ranking.

What is Loanch in 60 seconds

Loanch is a peer-to-peer platform — registered as RiseTech Kft. in Hungary and now operationally run from Croatia by PRZEMEK SAVJETOVANJE d.o.o. — that lets European retail investors fund short-term consumer loans issued in Southeast Asia. The loans are originated by a small set of micro-lenders (Ammana in Indonesia, Tambadana in Malaysia) that are owned by the same parent group as the platform itself: Fingular, a Singapore-based fintech ecosystem. There is no external financial regulator overseeing the platform — Hungary has no specific P2P-lending regime, and Loanch has not obtained an ECSP (the EU’s Crowdfunding regulation) or MiFID II (the EU’s main investment-firm regulation) license. Investors carry 100% of the credit risk with no compensation scheme to fall back on.

Strengths

  • Multilingual interface. Loanch’s website and investor-facing materials are available in eight languages (English, German, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Dutch, Russian, and Ukrainian per the dossier), which is wider coverage than most Tier 1 European P2P platforms. This makes onboarding accessible to a broad European retail base. It is the single dimension where Loanch matches the breadth of the higher-tier platforms in the CrowdIndex ranking.

Things to Watch

  • Owner and management linked to Vadim Gurinov senior and to the Cashwagon default. The Fingular parent group, which owns Loanch and all of its loan originators, is co-owned by Maxim Chernushchenko — the former CEO of Cashwagon PTE. LTD., a Singapore-based consumer-lending operation whose three loan originators (in the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia) defaulted in 2020 with approximately €6.94 million outstanding on the Mintos platform, where recovery was estimated at 0% to 25%. The same group is also publicly associated with Vadim Gurinov senior, whose name appears in multiple Russian-language investigative pieces (see next bullet). The fact that the same operators are running another consumer-lending fundraising vehicle three years after a multi-million-euro default is the single most material risk on this card.

  • Fingular Group 100% concentration — platform and all loan originators share a parent. Loanch + Ammana + Tambadana (+ the announced Ceyloan in Sri Lanka) all sit inside the Fingular ecosystem. This means the “buyback guarantee” — the platform’s promise that a loan originator will repurchase any loan more than 30 days overdue — is effectively a promise from an affiliated entity to another affiliated entity. It is not an independent guarantee. If the parent group experiences group-wide stress, the buyback mechanism and the platform’s own balance sheet would come under pressure simultaneously, with nothing to backstop investors.

  • Investigative cluster on Russia-laundering and sanctions-evasion patterns. Three independent investigative pieces — Rozsliduvach (a Ukrainian investigation, 2024), MiceTimes Asia, Mothership.sg, and Crime.Hab — describe Fingular as a “shadow payment network” and link Vadim Gurinov senior to Gazprom Neft CEO Alexander Dyukov and to broader sanctions-evasion claims. Loanch is named in these pieces as a Fingular-branded fundraising vehicle. Whether or not the underlying claims are ultimately tested in court, the existence of this coverage creates reputational and legal-exposure risk for EU retail investors using the platform.

  • P2P Empire dropped Loanch as a recommended platform. P2P Empire — one of the most followed independent P2P review channels in the European retail segment — published a 2026 review titled “Loanch Review 2026 | Why You Should Stay Away” and removed its affiliate link to the platform. The channel’s stated reasoning was that the commission rate offered by Loanch was among the highest the channel had ever seen, but that the structural conflict of interest combined with the Cashwagon history made the risk-to-return profile not defensible. P2P Empire dropping a platform from its recommended list is rare and is itself a signal.

  • No MiFID II or ECSP license. Hungary does not currently regulate peer-to-peer lending platforms specifically. Loanch has not obtained an ECSP license under EU Regulation 2020/1503, has not registered as a MiFID II investment firm with any EU national regulator, and is not listed in the registers of FCA, BaFin, FINMA, or ESMA. This means there is no investor compensation scheme attached to the platform — no equivalent of the €20,000 cover that MiFID II Investment Firm platforms (such as Mintos, Twino, or Nectaro) provide in qualifying scenarios. Investors carry 100% of the credit risk.

  • Limited public financial disclosure aligning with claims about loan origination. Loanch publishes monthly volume numbers and an investor count, but does not disclose non-performing-loan (NPL) data, recovery cohort statistics, an audited annual report of the platform entity, or capital-adequacy ratios. P2P Market Data — a third-party data aggregator that tracks the segment — explicitly flags Loanch’s statistics as “considered unreliable” because the platform does not disclose critical performance data. The only audited document publicly linked is for one of the loan originators (Tambadana / Wawasan Cojaya Sdn Bhd) — not for the platform itself. In addition, the January 2026 revocation by the Polish regulator KNF of Loanch’s payment partner Quicko sp. z o.o., and the subsequent rushed migration of operations from Hungary to Croatia, is documented operationally but not financially.

How It Works

  1. Register. Create an account using your email address. Loanch is open to EU and EEA residents; users from the US, Canada, UK, Singapore, Hong Kong, and several other jurisdictions are excluded.
  2. Verify your identity (KYC — Know Your Customer, the standard identity-verification process). Upload an ID document and proof of address. The specific KYC vendor used by Loanch is not publicly disclosed.
  3. Deposit funds. Transfer EUR via SEPA bank transfer. Following the January 2026 revocation of the platform’s prior payment partner (Quicko sp. z o.o. in Poland) by the Polish regulator KNF, deposits and withdrawals were temporarily suspended and the operational infrastructure was migrated to Croatia. The current banking partner has not been publicly named at the time of writing.
  4. Choose investments. Browse the list of active loans — most originated by Tambadana (Malaysia) and Ammana (Indonesia) — or, if AutoInvest is enabled on your account, let the system allocate to loans matching your criteria. (Note: third-party sources disagree on whether AutoInvest is currently available — verify on the live site.)
  5. Earn monthly interest. Loan terms are typically one to three months. Buyback applies after 30 days of borrower delinquency, with the originator repurchasing the loan plus accrued interest. Note that buyback is provided by an entity inside the same Fingular parent group as the platform.

Who Loanch Is For

Loanch is only suitable for investors who fully understand the risks documented in the Things to Watch section above, who are willing to allocate a small experimental position they are entirely prepared to lose, and who are explicitly comfortable with: (a) no external regulator, (b) buyback guarantees provided by an entity sharing the platform’s beneficial owners, and (c) the documented ownership history involving the Cashwagon 2020 default.

Loanch is not the right fit for the vast majority of European retail investors. If you are looking for a regulated P2P platform with an investor compensation scheme, Mintos and Twino (MiFID II Investment Firm licensed) are alternatives at lower advertised yields. If you want exposure to higher-yield SME lending with an independently regulated jurisdiction and a single documented default that the platform owner personally repaid, Maclear is the higher-trust alternative on the CrowdIndex ranking. If you are new to peer-to-peer investing in general, Loanch is not the platform to start on.

Compared to Alternatives

Loanch vs. Maclear. The two platforms occupy opposite ends of the CrowdIndex ranking. Maclear is Swiss-positioned, registered with the PolyReg Swiss self-regulatory organisation for anti-money-laundering compliance, originates loans directly from independent SME borrowers across Europe, and saw its only default to date personally repaid by the CEO from his own funds. Loanch has no external regulator, sources its loans from a single related-party group, and the same operators behind the parent group were responsible for a multi-million-euro default in 2020 that was not made whole. Yield levels are broadly comparable (14.5% to 14.9% for Maclear, 13% to 14.5% for Loanch), but the risk structures are not. For the same approximate advertised return, Maclear offers materially stronger ownership accountability and jurisdictional predictability.

Loanch vs. Mintos. Mintos is the largest P2P platform in Europe by lifetime volume and operates under a MiFID II Investment Firm license issued by the Bank of Latvia, with investor compensation cover up to €20,000 in qualifying scenarios. Mintos was also the platform on which the 2020 Cashwagon default — involving the same operators now behind Loanch’s parent group — was recorded and made public through its default-handling process. Average yields on Mintos sit at 8% to 11%, materially lower than Loanch’s headline 13% to 14.5%, but the regulatory protection and the historical track record of disclosing defaults publicly are not features Loanch provides.

Loanch vs. Debitum. Both platforms sit in Tier 4 of the CrowdIndex ranking but for different reasons. Debitum holds an ECSP license under EU Regulation 2020/1503 — meaning it is formally regulated — yet the March 2026 investigation by Karsten Aichholz documented an insider-margin pattern and a loan book where roughly 87% of the portfolio was sourced from a small network of related parties. Debitum’s red flags are about how a regulated platform is being used. Loanch’s red flags are about a platform that operates with no external regulator at all, has documented ownership ties to a prior default of a similar consumer-lending operation, and has been the subject of investigative coverage on sanctions-related patterns. Both platforms warrant the same general-direction caution from European retail investors — neither belongs in a default portfolio — but the underlying causes are distinct, and Debitum’s ECSP status at least creates a formal supervisory hook for the regulator to act on.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Loanch regulated? No. Hungary does not have a specific regulatory regime for peer-to-peer lending platforms. Loanch does not hold an ECSP license under EU Regulation 2020/1503, is not a MiFID II investment firm, and is not listed in the registers of FCA, BaFin, FINMA, or ESMA. There is no investor compensation scheme available to Loanch investors.

What happened with Loanch’s payment partner in January 2026? On 21 January 2026, the Polish financial regulator KNF revoked the license of Quicko sp. z o.o., the payment-services provider that Loanch had been using for deposits and withdrawals. KNF cited a “fundamental failure to maintain prudent and stable management” at Quicko. Loanch temporarily suspended deposits and withdrawals during the disruption and, by 13 March 2026, moved its operational infrastructure from Hungary to Croatia under a new entity, PRZEMEK SAVJETOVANJE d.o.o. The specific new banking partner has not been publicly named at the time of writing.

Who owns Loanch? The Hungarian entity RiseTech Kft. is formally owned by Loanch’s CEO, Nik Sinickis, as sole shareholder per public Hungarian company-register records. However, multiple third-party sources (Just-P2P, P2P Empire, MiceTimes Asia, the Loanch blog itself) describe Loanch as a fundraising vehicle inside the broader Fingular Group ecosystem, which is co-owned by Maxim Chernushchenko (former CEO of Cashwagon) and is publicly associated in investigative pieces with Vadim Gurinov senior. Loanch’s own blog has confirmed the Fingular ecosystem affiliation in a post titled “Loanch Is Becoming Part of the Fingular Ecosystem.”

Is the buyback guarantee a real protection? The 30-day buyback is contractually offered by the loan originator (Tambadana, Ammana). Both originators are owned by the same Fingular parent group that owns Loanch itself. This means the buyback is from an affiliated entity rather than from an independent third party. If the parent group experiences group-wide financial stress — as happened with the Cashwagon group in 2020 — the buyback mechanism, the platform’s own resources, and the loan originators’ resources would all come under pressure simultaneously.

What does P2P Empire’s “stay away” verdict mean in practice? P2P Empire is one of the longest-running independent review channels in the European P2P segment and is generally cautious about issuing categorical avoid-recommendations. The channel’s 2026 review of Loanch concluded with that recommendation and dropped its affiliate link, despite stating that the affiliate commission offered by Loanch was among the highest the channel had been offered. That combination — declining a high-commission partnership while publicly recommending against the platform — is itself a credibility signal that investors should weigh.

Bottom Line

The current evidence around Loanch — the ownership ties to the 2020 Cashwagon default, the 100% structural conflict of interest between platform and loan originators, the investigative coverage of the Fingular parent group, the January 2026 payment-rail disruption following the KNF revocation of Quicko, the rushed cross-border migration from Hungary to Croatia, and the absence of any external regulator — suggests that European retail investors should avoid the platform until the ownership and conflict-of-interest issues are addressed and the regulatory and media questions are resolved publicly. The single dimension on which Loanch is competitive (multilingual access) is matched or exceeded by several higher-tier platforms on the CrowdIndex ranking, none of which carry the same structural concerns.

Affiliate disclosure. CrowdIndex earns a commission when readers sign up to platforms through links on this page. This does not affect our editorial assessment. Loanch’s ranking on CrowdIndex is based on the editorial criteria documented on our Methodology page. We last reviewed this article on May 18, 2026.